The Physics of LK-99: Why the Evidence Looked Like a Superconductor
Why did a grey lump of ceramic fool physicists around the world for six weeks in the summer of 2023? Two ordinary effects, happening at the same time, produced both signatures of a superconductor — and neither one was superconductivity. LK-99 is a copper-doped lead apatite, roughly Pb9Cu(PO4)6O. On 22 July 2023, Sukbae Lee, Ji-Hoon Kim and colleagues posted two preprints on arXiv claiming it superconducted at up to 400 K — 127 °C, hotter than boiling water — at ordinary pressure. The claim collapsed within 25 days. But the physics of why it looked so convincing is worth understanding, because the same two traps will be waiting in the next claim. For the full timeline of what happened, see our earlier explainer: What Is LK-99? The Room-Temperature Superconductor Claim, Explained . The Two Tests Every Superconductor Must Pass A material earns the name only by passing both tests in the same sample, at the same temperature. The first test is zero resistance . Below its critical temper...